BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS OF INFLAMMATION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME
https://doi.org/10.15372/ATER20190305
Abstract
Aim of the study was to reveal differential features of inflammatory response markers in myocardial infarction (MI) compared to unstable angina (UA) and to determine activation of which inflammatory biochemical markers accompanies cardiomyocyte damage at early stage of necrosis development in patients with MI.
Materials and methods. A total of 279 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) included in the database of percutaneous coronary interventions in 2012-2013 were examined. Group 1 included 69 patients with UA, group 2 consisted of 210 patients with MI. Biochemical markers of inflammation and myocardial injury were determined upon admission to the hospital, in order to clarify the nature of the relationship between them an automated artificial neural network (ANN) was constructed.
Results. Patients with MI compared to UA patients had higher serum levels of troponin-T (0,71 [0.10; 2.00] and 0.00 [0.00; 0.00] ng/ml, respectively, p < 0.01) and creatine phosphokinase MB isoenzyme (CPK-MB) (70,7 [31.2; 159.6] and 20.1 [11.6; 29.7] u/l, respectively, p < 0.001) as well as C-reactive protein (CRP) (6.20 [2.01; 10.22] and 3.40 [0.86; 6.03] mg/l, respectively, p < 0.001) and homocysteine (15.4 [12.2; 18.3] and 13.8 [10.4;16.4] μmol/l, respectively, p = 0.028); data are presented as: median [lower quartile; upper quartile]. Later, the ANN model (multilayer perceptron) was obtained with an input layer consisting of three neurons representing the following serum biochemical parameters: CPK-MB, homocysteine and CRP concentration. The greatest predictive value for the confirmation of myocardial injury were homocysteine and CRP content.
Conclusions. Patients with MI and UA did not differ in cytokine level. According to the obtained ANN model, homocysteine activation as a marker of systemic inflammation and CRP as a marker of local inflammatory response accompany cardiomyocyte damage at early stages of necrosis development in patients with MI.
About the Authors
N. A. MusikhinaRussian Federation
T. I. Petelina
Russian Federation
I. V. Emeneva
Russian Federation
S. M. Dyachkov
Russian Federation
References
1. Biasucci L.M., Colizzi C., Rizzello V., Vitrella G., Crea F., Liuzzo G. Role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of unstable coronary artery diseases // Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. Suppl. 1999. Vol. 230. P. 12–22.
2. Kubková L., Spinar J., Pávková Goldbergová M., Jarkovský J., Pařenica J. Inflammatory response and C-reactive protein value in patient with acute coronary syndrome [Article in Czech] // Vnitr Lek. 2013. Nov. Vol. 59 (11). P. 981–988.
3. Wang X., Guo Z., Ding Z., Mehta J.L. Inflammation, autophagy, and apoptosis after myocardial infarction // J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2018. Vol. 7, N 9. P. e008024. 4. Богова О.Т., Чукаева И.И. Инфаркт миокарда. Воспаление и прогноз // Рос. кардиол. журн. 2003. ¹ 4. С. 95–98.
4. Vanhaverbeke M., Veltman D., Pattyn N., de Crem N., Gillijns H., Cornelissen V., Janssens S., Sinnaeve P.R. C-reactive protein during and after myocardial infarction in relation to cardiac injury and left ventricular function at follow-up // Clin. Cardiol. 2018. Vol. 41. P. 1201–1206.
5. Fiechter M., Ghadri J.R., Jaguszewski M., Siddique A., Vogt S., Haller R.B., Halioua R., Handzic A., Kaufmann P.A., Corti R., Lüscher T.F., Templin C. Impact of inflammation on adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes // J. Cardiovasc. Med. (Hagerstown). 2013. Vol. 14, N 11. P. 807–814.
6. Ridker P.M., Manson J.E., Goldhaber S.Z., Hennekens C.H., Buring J.E. Comparison of delay times to hospital presentation for physicians and nonphysicians with acute myocardial infarction // Am. J. Cardiol. 1992. Vol. 70, N 1. P. 10–13.
7. Oudi M.E., Aouni Z., Mazigh C., Khochkar R., Gazoueni E., Haouela H., Machghoul S. Homocysteine and markers of inflammation in acute coronary syndrome // Exp. Clin. Cardiol. 2010. Vol. 15, N 2. P. е25–е28.
8. Лебедева А.Ю., Михайлова К.В. Взаимосвязь ги- пергомоцистеинемии, нарушения внутрисосуди- стого свертывания крови и клинического течения инфаркта миокарда // Рос. кардиол. журн. 2007. № 2. С. 41–46.
9. Prajapati J., Jain S., Virpariya K., Rawal J., Joshi H., Sharma K., Roy B., Thakkar A. Novel atherosclerotic risk factors and angiographic profile of young Gujarati patients with acute coronary syndrome // J. Assoc. Physicians India. 2014. Vol. 62, N 7. P. 584–588.
10. Fu Z., Qian G., Xue H., Guo J., Chen L., Yang X., Shen M., Dong W., Chen Y. Hyperhomocysteinemia is an independent predictor of long-term clinical outcomes in Chinese octogenarians with acute coronary syndrome // Clin. Interv. Aging. 2015. Vol. 10. P. 1467–1474.
11. Han T.W., Zhou S.S., Li J.T., Tian F., Mu Y., Jing J., Han Y.F., Chen Y.D. Homocysteine is associated with the progression of non-culprit coronary lesions in elderly acute coronary syndrome patients after percutaneous coronary intervention // J. Geriatr. Cardiol. 2016. Vol. 13, N 4. P. 299–305.
12. Шаленкова М.А., Мухаметова Э.Т., Михайлова З.Д. Роль маркеров некроза и воспаления в прогнозировании острых форм ишемической болезни сердца // Клин. медицина. 2013. ¹ 11. С. 14–20.
13. Зорина В.Н., Белоконева К.П., Бичан Н.А. Реактанты острой фазы воспаления и провоспали- тельные цитокины при различных осложнениях инфаркта миокарда // Клин. лаб. диагностика. 2012. ¹ 1. С. 28–30.
14. Рагино Ю.И., Куимов А.Д., Полонская Я.В., Каштанова Е.В., Ложкина Н.Г., Балабушевич Т.А., Еременко Н.В., Негмаджонов У.Н. Динамика изменений воспалительно-окислительных биомаркеров в крови при остром коронарном синдроме // Кардиология. 2012. ¹ 2. С. 18–22.
15. Mihlan M., Blom A.M., Kupreishvili K., Lauer N., Stelzner K., Bergström F., Niessen H.W., Zipfel P.F. Monomeric C-reactive protein modulates classic complement activation on necrotic cells // FASEB J. 2011. Vol. 25, N 12. P. 4198–4210.
16. Reindl M., Reinstadler S.J., Feistritzer H.J., Klug G., Tiller C., Mair J., Mayr A., Jaschke W., Metzler B. Relation of inflammatory markers with myocardial and microvascular injury in patients with reperfused STelevation myocardial infarction // Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care. 2017. Vol. 7. P. 640–649.
17. Bavia L., Lidani K.C.F., Andrade F.A., Sobrinho M.I.A.H., Nisihara R.M., de Messias-Reason I.J. Complement activation in acute myocardial infarction: An early marker of inflammation and tissue injury? // Immunol. Lett. 2018. Vol. 200. P. 18–25.
18. Oh S.J., Na Kim E., Jai Kim C., Choi J.S., Kim K.B. The effect of C-reactive protein deposition on myocardium with ischaemia-reperfusion injury in rats // Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2017. Vol. 25, N 2. P. 260–267.
19. Бутенко А. В. Гомоцистеин: влияние на биохимические процессы в организме человека // Молодой ученый. 2016. № 1. С. 78–82. URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/105/24912/ (дата обращения: 25.09.2019).
20. Yilmaz N. Relationship between paraoxonase and homocysteine: crossroads of oxidative diseases // Arch. Med. Sci. 2012. Vol. 8, N 1. Р. 138–153.
21. Alam N., Khan H.I., Chowdhury A.W., Haque M.S., Ali M.S., Sabah K.M., Amin M.G. Elevated serum homocysteine level has a positive correlation with serum cardiac troponin I in patients with acute myocardial infarction // Bangladesh Med. Res. Counc. Bull. 2012. Vol. 38, N 1. P. 9–13.
22. Xu H., Liu C., Wang Q. Plaque image characteristics, hyperhomocysteinemia, and gene polymorphism of homocysteine metabolism-related enzyme (MTHFR C677T) in acute coronary syndrome // Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2013. Vol. 66, N 2. P. 403–407.
Review
For citations:
Musikhina N.A., Petelina T.I., Emeneva I.V., Dyachkov S.M. BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS OF INFLAMMATION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME. Ateroscleroz. 2019;15(3):56-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15372/ATER20190305