Peculiarities of the hospital stage of acute myocardial infarction in patients with varying severity of coronary atherosclerosis on a scale SYNTAX after endovascular treatment

   The aim of this study was to investigate characteristics of a hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction in patients with varying degrees of severity of coronary lesions on a scale SYNTAX after endovascular treatment. The severity of coronary lesions on a scale SYNTAX evaluated in 330 consecutive patients (274 men and 56 women), mean age 53.6 ± 8.9 years, with acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. This patients were divided into three groups: a group with severe coronary disease (SYNTAX ≥ 33), with moderate (SYNTAX from 23 to 32) and low lesion (SYNTAX from 0 to 22). In patients with severe coronary disease had fewer than in patients with low values of the defeat of the Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH), Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC), and total protein, and high density lipoprotein cholesterol. In groups with SYNTAX from 23 to 32 and with SYNTAX ≥ 33 higher blood glucose levels than in the SYNTAX from 0 to 22, and the rate of urea in patients with severe coronary disease exceed the value of this parameter in patients with low and moderate coronary disease. In patients with severe coronary disease are more likely than those with low lesions observed the phenomenon of non-resumption of blood flow after stenting (no-reflow), stent thrombosis, pulmonary edema, acute aneurysm recurrence of heart attack and bleeding. Using binary logistic regression (χ² model = 25.4, p < 0.001) we revealed that with heavy coronary lesion (SYNTAX ≥ 33) most significantly associated pleural effusion (p < 0.001), the phenomenon of non-renewal blood flow after stenting (no-reflow) (p = 0.004), and acute aneurysm (p = 0.039).

1. Garg S., Sarno G., Garcia-Garcia H. M. et al. A new tool for the risk stratification of patients with complex coronary artery disease: the Clinical SYNTAX Score // Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2010. Vol. 3, N 4. P. 317–326.

2. Yang C. H., Hsieh M. J., Chen C. C. et al. The prognostic significance of SYNTAX score after early percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction // Heart Lung Circ. 2013. Vol. 22, N 5. P. 341–345.

3. Тарасов Р. С. Прогностическая значимость шкалы SYNTAX в оценке исходов и выбора тактики реваскуляризации у пациентов c инфарктом миокарда и подъемом сегмента ST при многососудистом поражении коронарного русла Р. С. Тарасов [и др.] // Терапевт. арх. – 2012. – Т. 84, № 9. – С. 17–21.

4. Kul S., Akgul O., Uyarel H. et al. High SYNTAX score predicts worse in-hospital clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction // Coron. Artery Dis. 2012. Vol. 23, N 8. P. 542–548.

5. Sianos G., Morel M. A., Kappetein A. P. et al. The SYNTAX score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease // EuroIntervention. 2005. Vol. 1, N 2. P. 219–227.

6. Serruys P. W., Morice M. C., Kappetein A. P. et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease // N. Engl. J. Med. 2009. Vol. 360. P. 961–972.

7. Николаева А. А. Сосудистая реактивность и эндотелиальные дисфункции при артериальной гипертензии и ишемической болезни сердца (диагностика, лечение и профилактика) / А. А. Николаева, К. Ю. Николаев, Л. В. Попова. – Новосибирск: ГПНТБ СО РАН, 2006. – 192 с.

8. Николаев К. Ю. Микроциркуляторная эндотелийзависимая сосудистая реактивность и основные факторы риска / К. Ю. Николаев [и др.] // Бюл. СО РАМН. – 2006. – № 4. – С. 63–66.

9. Xiao J. Y., Zhang H. N., Cao L., Cong H. L. An analysis of relationship between the severity of coronary artery lesion and risk factors of cardiovascular events in Tianjin // Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2013. Vol. 25, N 11. P. 650–654.

10. Reis J. P., Launer L. J., Terry J. G. et al. Subclinical atherosclerotic calcification and cognitive functioning in middle-aged adults: the CARDIA study // Atherosclerosis. 2013. Vol. 231, N 1. P. 72–77.

11. Кишкун А. А. Руководство по лабораторным методам диагностики / А. А. Кишкун. – М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2007. – 789 с.

12. Nagy E., Eaton J. W., Jeney V. et al. Red cells, hemoglobin, heme, iron, and atherogenesis // Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2010. Vol. 30, N 7. P. 1347–1353.

13. Николаева А. А. Особенности нейроэндокринных нарушений регуляции при остром инфаркте миокарда в зависимости от тяжести течения заболевания / А. А. Николаева [и др.] // Кардиология. – 1993. – Т. 33, № 11. – С. 60–63.

14. Waggiallah H., Alzohairy M. The effect of oxidative stress on human red cells glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase level, and prevalence of anemia among diabetics // N. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2011. Vol. 3, N 7. P. 344–347.

15. Shekhanawar M., Shekhanawar S. M., Krisnaswamy D. et al. The role of ‘paraoxonase-1 activity’ as an antioxidant in coronary artery diseases // J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2013. Vol. 7, N 7. P. 1284–1287.

16. Duran M., Uysal O. K., Yilmaz Y. et al. Serum gamma-glutamyltransferase and the burden of atherosclerosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome // Turk. Kardiyol. Dern. Ars. 2013. Vol. 41, N 4. P. 275–281.

17. Aksakal E., Tanboga I. H., Kurt M. et al. Predictors of coronary lesions complexity in patients with stable сoronary artery disease // Angiology. 2013. Vol. 64, N 4. P. 304–309.

18. Şahin D. Y., Gür M., Elbasan Z. et al. SYNTAX score is a predictor of angiographic no-reflow in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with a primary percutaneous coronary intervention // Coron. Artery Dis. 2013. Vol. 24, N 2. P. 148–153.

19. Yadav M., Généreux P., Palmerini T. et al. SYNTAX Score and the risk of stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: An ACUITY trial substudy // Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. 2014. Vol. 85, N 1. P. 1–10.